i have no idea what i am doing --Oblivious troll (talk) 22:08, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Right for starters you did not leave me a signature on your message so it took me ages to find you.Two you tried to criticize my work when looking at your only page Jacob 068 its piss poor.Its canon wrong more than 1 spartan II survived augmentation and I highly doubt a six year old could shoot a poacher in the head with a M14 from 1.5km.Now that's not possible.And youre telling me that my page is stupid but not what parts.Now I'll be civil with you if you learn some FUCKING MANORS <----Pardon my french and be more specific and leave you're signature.

Gerardthemighty (talk) 22:41, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Well you have a problem with me what is it,I sense its because I'm Scottish as the previous message hinted.

Gerardthemighty (talk) 23:02, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Savier zerker
Anonymous ONI agent - Gwneud o dân, a gyda chalonnau wneud o iâ.
"From this moment onward, you are Egon Talorus. And to humanity, you are everything.":

TALK - 23:07, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
I understand it may have irritated you, but that's no excuse for your actions. You could've chosen not to react to Gerard's comment and you wouldn't be in any trouble right now. The admins and other veteran users are very much aware that there are issues with Gerard's pages, but we simply haven't gotten around to dealing with it. He's also a relatively new user, so issues are to be expected. Almost every user's articles have issues when they start out, and I was no exception when I was new, you can see my first ever edit here if you want proof. You aren't an exception either, and Gerard could've easily gone and said the same about you. Ideally, you should have spoken to an administrator about your concerns and let them deal with it. It wasn't your place to do so yourself.

In response I see what you mean about just Scottish but thats where I'm starting off from.Somewhere I'm close to and start easily.I have included many other things though such as the Cairo Police force which I am working on right now.You need to remember that there are millions of people with Scottish decent and thats why the ship has a Scottish Crew and the sister ship a american crew.If you just stop with all this then I'll call it quits as well.

Civility Warning #1

UNSC navy2
Athena32"We will take our city back. And drive our enemy into the grave they've been so happily digging."
Hello Oblivious troll, and may I take this opportunity to welcome you to Halo Fanon.

The reasons for this message is not a happy one. Your language, conduct and civility on multiple pages, including the talk pages of Gerardthemighty and Anonymous ONI agent, is totally unacceptable, and will not be tolerated. Contrary to your opinion, you are not entitled to join our site and proceed to swear at and insult other users. We have Rules here regarding civility between users; I suggest you read them very rapidly. In addition, if you have problems with another users' article, and are not capable of stating them politely and coherently, then refrain from doing so. If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. Your inflammatory comment caused this entire situation, and I do not appreciate having to deal with this kind of immature nonsense.

This is a formal, verbal warning. On account of you being relatively new here, I have decided to give you the benefit of the doubt, and hold off on anything more severe. That ends now. You have been warned now that such conduct is unacceptable. If you continue with disruptive behaviour there will be more serious consequences, including temporary banning.

This is not, however, me telling you to leave this site. Your first contributions have not been constructive; but that does not mean that future ones can't be. Put this behind you, and from here on be a respectful and constructive user. Do that, and we won't have any more problems. If you need to contact me or any other administrators for help or questions, please feel free to do so.

Best regards.

Civility Warning #2

I&#039;m surrounded by idiots
Sonasaurus — I'm surrounded by idiots
TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 11:34, January 11, 2013 (EST)
For uncivil language on this page, and unwillingness to obey the site guidelines, I'm issuing you a second civility warning and a 24-hour block. This should be pretty self-explanatory, as well as how you can prevent this problem from becoming any more serious than it already is. I'd like to remind you that a third civility warning will earn you a much longer ban, so I suggest you behave yourself.

Unofficial warning

SonasaurusSpartans never die. And neither do they
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 21:35, April 22, 2013 (EST)
The reasons your article was tagged NCF have all been stated on the talk page. How about you actually address them, instead of trying to remove the tag and telling other users to fuck off. Consider this your unofficial warning to be civil and follow site rules.

Response to request

I would have no cause to revert your edits if you were to fix the issues with the article and follow the guidelines clearly laid out for you. Given that you have claimed to have read the rules, I see no reason why you'd expect me to not react to violations of those rules. Auguststorm1945 (Talk) 01:41, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

SonasaurusHonour above all else
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 22:00, April 22, 2013 (EST)
I'm repeating myself here, but the reasons your article was tagged NCF have all been stated on the talk page. You have not yet made the appropriate revisions to your article, which is why it's still NCF. As for Alyss' page, your points have been found to be invalid, which is why the NCF tag you put there was removed.

SonasaurusThey are coming for us...who will stand together?
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 22:08, April 22, 2013 (EST)
You realize throwing insults isn't going to help your case at all, and in fact just makes you look worse for it. Whether or not you're going to stick to the rules is your choice, but whatever you do, I will act accordingly. And you're really treading the line right now, so I would suggest you keep a civil tongue in your head if you don't want another ban on your account.

SonasaurusYou loved her. You always have
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 22:17, April 22, 2013 (EST)
"The reasons your article was tagged NCF have all been stated on the talk page. How about you actually address them, instead of trying to remove the tag and telling other users to fuck off."
―Above messages

I don't know how many times I have to repeat this, but you don't seem to be getting the point. There's really nothing more for me to say.

SonasaurusThe Cabal is watching you, <insert name here>
TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 22:43, April 22, 2013 (EST)
I find it hilarious that you would accuse me of hypocrisy in canon when your own article's realism is questionable at best, and that you would think I "gloss over things" when your idea of a valid counter-argument is to repeat yourself without even acknowledging the points made against you. But nonetheless, I will endeavor to answer your questions even though the only thing I owe you at this point is a week-long ban for your repeated incivility.
  1. Mythiiical's Noble Six article is not complete, and in no part does it state that she had survived the Battle of Reach. Missing information is not a green light for you to assume anything on the author's part, although that's not so much in our rules as it is common sense.
  2. As per rule 5.1, we consider articles to be NCF when they are in direct contradictions of definitively established canon. In this case, Noble Six was not confirmed in canon to have been killed on Reach, although there is an implication (but not confirmed either) that he or she is dead as of 2589. This was something that was already been made clear to you on Alyss' talk page, and you've seen it yourself but chose to re-add the NCF template even though you had no valid response to it.
  3. Your "evidence" to suggest that Noble Six could only have been dead, and nothing but, is flimsy and was already refuted. Where are these "bunch of sources" you claim to have? Even Halopedia has no solid evidence that he or she died, and the date of death printed there is made based on an assumption, as are all these other "sources" you will likely find.
  4. As a final point, be mindful that NCFing can be seen as a serious offense if used improperly or in bad faith. And you have certainly acted in bad faith and consequently toed the line of incivility when you were reprimanded for it.

All these things were already pointed out to you on the talk page, but you chose to simply ignore them. And then you had the nerve to call anyone out who disagreed with you as a bully or hypocrite. So, this is the last time I'm going to say this, behave yourself, or I will take administrative action.

SonasaurusWithin its barren layers, something has been held for aeons
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 22:52, April 22, 2013 (EST)
A take-home lesson for you to think about over the next 24 hours, being a smartass to an administrator and responding to warnings with stupidity does not end well for you. Enjoy your ban.

MaslabI am assuming direct control.I am the harbinger of your destiny.Preserve <insert name here>'s body if possible.Releasing control.
TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — Saturday, July 11 2020 (Pacific Standard Time)
Per discussion with Sonasaurus, he has agreed to reduce your ban to one day instead of one month. Please do keep in mind that, even though administrators are not perfect either, that does not allow you to defy the rules and be rude.

To insinuate the Administrators are 'all bad' because they impose limits on what is considered acceptable conduct, because you were banned for defying these limits is quite childish. Act like a civil, responcible adult and you won't have this problem. On a side note, you might want to chancge your username; it kinda has a stigma attached to it (i.e. monitoring Recent Changes, I feel drawn into ensuring what you are doing is not manevolent).

With regards,

Rainbow Dash Rainbow_Dash.png (Talk) (Contribs) 22:35, April 25, 2013 (UTC)


SonasaurusTrust is to know. Faith is to believe
Spartan laser

TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 11:04, May 10, 2013 (EST)
I appreciate your offer, but you don't have enough edits, and more importantly, wiki experience, to be part of the cleanup.

RE: Removal of templates

This is your first warning about removing templates on your page. We notice, and readd them, along with the template for removing them. If you do it again after this message is sent, you will be rewarded a day ban; successive warnings will vield lengither bans as per the three strikes policy.

On a side note, read talk pages of tagged pages, please. And stop removing templates. Its fracking annoying to click the 'rollback' button.

-Rainbow Dash Rainbow_Dash.png (Talk) (Contribs) 00:21, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Another Civility warning with two month ban

Your outburst on the Jacob-068 page is intolorable, and coupled with the above warnings, you have been issued a two month ban from the HFFW, to which you are advised to seriously reflect your conduct and to ponder amendments to make for the future, should you wish tocontinue to edit here.

Good day.

Rainbow Dash Rainbow_Dash.png (Talk) (Contribs) 00:30, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Civility warning #3

SonasaurusThe Cabal is watching you, <insert name here>
TALK CONTRIBUTIONS — 20:31, May 12, 2013 (EST)
I guess you already know what this is about by now. Cussing out other users is not mature nor is it productive, and the fact that you picked a fight with another admin is especially a bad idea. If you want to resolve your problems, you'll always do better with politeness than you will with obscenity. No one has vandalized your articles; the simple matter of the situation is that you refuse to accept that your articles need revision, and that you think you're somehow above the rules here. The sooner you can admit that this is no one's fault but your own, the less you'll force other users to make your life difficult.

Also, I've lost count by now how many times you've been told not to remove templates on your own pages. Even if you feel that you have resolved the issues, you must either inform an administrator or the user who tagged the article, and they will remove the tag for you if they see that the issue really has been resolved. This has been laid out in crystal clarity on the rules, and the fact that you chose not to follow them properly is no one's fault but your own.

You're receiving a 2-month ban, one month each for the incivility and the fact that you've ignored the repeated warnings not to remove templates from your articles. As a final word of advice, you said on your userpage that you wanted to change your questionable reputation here, but making the same mistakes you did in the past is a very poor way of accomplishing it. Regards.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.