Talk:First Battle of Kyoto Fortress

Canon Friendliness
Well, first I'd like to point out that according to a policy I discovered, we don't like fanon to conflict. Now, technically, the numbers don't conflict (we'll get to those later). However, there is a SPARTAN-098 that happens to be named Marcus, similar to your SPARTAN-099. Coincidence? Probably. However, more importantly, SPARTAN-II callsigns do not go above 150, thus Donna-174 is a breach of canon. This is the important part, since technically by some twist of fate there might be two Spartans with the same name right next to each other designation-wise.
 * -- Master Gunnery Sergeant  Hank J Wimbleton IV COMHalo: Galaxy 07:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Whoops
Whoops, sorry about the breach. I'm kind of new to Halo beyond the games. The 098/099 thing actually was a coincidence. The character was inspired by a friend of mine named Marcus. And I had no idea the Spartan-II numbers stopped after 150. I've renamed Marcus Mark in my article, is that okay? And I've put Donna as Spartan-128. Is there already a Spartan with that designation? Also, I recently discovered a Spartan-118 article. Though, my 118 was created over a year ago (User Grievous 797 is my witness), but I did not know of this site at the time, so did not create the character. Should I or Spartan-118 change their character? And about Hang 'Em High as the name: This was actually inspired by a modded map of Hang 'Em High with Ai added that my friends and I played, hence the name. I was mainly using it as a placeholder until I could think of a better name.

-MasterGreen999

With the changes you have made, the article appears to be better. You can check existing Spartans at Halo Fanon:Spartans of Fanon, though you should cross reference Category:SPARTAN because not all of the Spartans are listed in the Spartans of Fanon page.
 * -- Master Gunnery Sergeant  Hank J Wimbleton IV COMHalo: Galaxy 10:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)