User blog comment:Spartan-091/ProTips: How to Circumvent Our NCF Policy (Apologies to Ajax for the Method)/@comment-74526-20100929062601

I dislike technobabble. While a great deal of my articles carry statements that may be seen as technobabble, the difference between them and the "reverse the polarity of the neutron flow to energise the nadions" variety, is that they're actually realistic. I despise the Treknobabble approach of "slam together as many sciencey words as possible to make it look to John Q. Viewer that we've done any research at all." It's deceptive from one point of view and downright insulting to a viewer's intelligence from another.

Oh, and if you do go through with this to try and get your lame NCF article non-NCF'd, you'll probably only get the cool defies the laws of physics gravity cat template.