Forum:Administrative Re-evaluation

As some of you may remember from my proposal a couple months back, and as many of you have agreed with me on, our administration is in serious need of cleaning house. Having put in my two cents, and taking into consideration your feedback, I'm going to lay out the procedure for this re-evaluation system. Now all that's left to do is for you to vote on it, and if necessary, work out any last-minute kinks.


 * 1) The re-evaluation will take place every 20 months, on the first day of the month that it takes place.
 * 2) Every user presently in service to Halo Fanon's administration will be placed under this re-evaluation.
 * 3) Administrators should be voted off only if they are evidently inactive, or are active and do little to no administrative duties. Incidents involving misconduct on administrators' parts should be filed as Requests for De-administration.
 * 4) An administrator with a majority vote in being removed from the administration will be permitted to make an appeal, addressing points made against him or her by the community without arguing subjectively.
 * 5) If an administrator with a majority opposing vote makes an appeal, users are permitted to address points made in the appeal, again without arguing subjectively.
 * 6) To make the procedure as coherent as possible, there will not be a comments section for any administrative re-evaluation. Personal or individual discussions should be carried out on user talk pages to prevent unnecessary flooding of comments on the re-evaluation page.
 * 7) Users may change their vote at any time before the re-evaluation closes.
 * 8) The bureaucrat or bureaucrats currently in service to Halo Fanon must act according to the majority vote in each re-evaluation.

If there are any additional rules you think should be present, please let me know in the comments section below.