User blog comment:Anonymous ONI agent/New & improved quality control policies: yay or nay?/@comment-138261-20130805083641

Apparently, my post didn't load properly, so I'll repost.

We already namespace articles under the grammar tag, but as Leo said, we're lazy gits, it often gets overlooked.

As for style, its a pretty stupid policy to enforce. Every article requiring an infobox is pretty on the stupid side, since they're there purely to make the article look like a wikipedia article, and wouldn't work on prose or free verse articles. Besides, I've seen plenty of articles that are excellent reads that don't use infoboxes. There's no need for them to have to be on. Secondly, the wikia standard layout content is usually left in there by newbies. Tagging articles with that in, and threatening to namespace articles because of it is tantamount to NCF a user's first article because a date might be a year out.

And for the NCFing newbies with only minor mistakes. I know I and a few other contributors already take a lenient stance on that, where we just tell them of the minor issues on the talk page without resorting to NCF tags.

This blog belongs to the department of redundancy.