Halo Fanon:Administrative Evaluation/2013

Halo Fanon &gt; Administrative Evaluation &gt; 2013

Discharge (1/1)

 * 1) LOMI has been, for the past five years, an excellent administrator, and one of my fellow bureaucrats for the past two who I have had a great pleasure working with. However, due to a combination of his inactivity, self-declared lack of motivation to write about Halo, and his recurring mentions of contemplating retirement, I think it's time to let him go.

Sustain (1/1)

 * 1) As the currently senior active admin, I'm pleasantly surprised to see that Ajax is still around and willing to be part of the wiki. His recourse in activity in the last couple of years as well as his significant improvement in conduct wins my support.

Discharge (1/1)

 * 1) If I'm to be perfectly unbiased, I would say that AR has been (and may always be) Halo Fanon's most rational user to have served on the administration. But since he is currently devoting most of his time to military service in the Republic of Korea, I reluctantly deem his on-and-off appearances to be unsuitable for administrative duties.

Discharge (1/1)

 * 1) This is a really tough one for me, since Maslab has been one of my closest long-time writing partners on Halo Fanon. When he was first elected as administrator in 2010, I can wholeheartedly say that he had done well with the position. But after one, then two, now three years and he has demonstrated a consistent lack of willingness and/or time to even be somewhat active, let alone carry out administrative duties, I'm afraid I'm going to vote him off.

Discharge (1/1)

 * 1) Ever since Leo has moved to New Zealand in late 2011, his activity levels have dropped significantly and never picked itself back up since then. My numerous attempts to encourage him to be more active have proven to be fruitless, and if I must be frank, his occasional handfuls of cleanup isn't enough to even the scales.

Sustain (1/1)

 * 1) While Athena32 has a lot of his time occupied with military service and his writing levels have gone down, he appears regularly on the IRC and is usually present when needed. And as a member of the Good Article panel, he has shown sufficient commitment to read through the nominated articles, some of which are quite long. While I can't say I'm remarkably pleased with his contribution as an administrator, he will get a pass from me for the time being.