User blog comment:AWikiObserver334/A Word to the Administrators/@comment-29923344-20140425185120/@comment-24179747-20140425212803

Both of you make valid points. In fact I agree with most of them. I fully understand that writing is not set in stone. I know that it is also not the job of the staff to babysit any one member or "do their work for them" as was stated above. I was getting more at the point of canon related issues but I don't beleive I suggested that staff should help out people randomly because that would be very tedious work I am sure due to the vastness of the wiki. I merely thought it would be helpful for staff to provide possible alternate methods of getting at the end result of a work that have a few problems along the way that make the validity of it crumble. Some non-canon points (especially in my writing) are merely there as a means to an end. I myself did not pay much heed to these things in my own writing because I was more focused on the goal I was trying to achieve following a somewhat basic (Previously concocted) outline which itself was canon-following. However I do see your points on how staff can't do anything and I hope I didn't say anything to suggest that. I appreciate that you guys put some thought into this.