Forum:Qualification Proposed Rewrite

And yet again this is H*bad bringing you the latest in proposals. So according to the Halo Fanon:Requests for Administration, it basically says that if you have a history of vandalism, or other, you can't run for an Administrator position...ever. I was reading it and I have a wonder, what if a user comes back onto the wiki and becomes well liked, etc by the users/administrators. Should they user really be put behind a blockade all because of some really stupid choices? And even if someone has a history of vandalism, it's not like them running means that they have a chance of winning and then "overthrowing" the administrators or something. If the users and administration don't trust the user, then they don't have to vote. The clauses state:


 * 1)  No history of vandalism or abuse of Halo Fanon for the user in question, and no history of compromised accounts for the user in question.
 * 2) No history of blocking on the basis of harassment or personal attacks.

I am proposing an amendment to that to allow for users who come back and show considerable amount of change and addition trust from the community may be allowed to become an Administrator.

Thanks, H*bad (talk)